Crypto Exchange Security Score Calculator
Assess Your Exchange Security Risk
This tool helps you calculate the security risk score of a crypto exchange based on key security features and incident history.
When you hear "hype crypto exchange," you might think of flashy ads, celebrity endorsements, or promises of instant riches. But if you're actually considering trading on Hyperliquid, you need to cut through the noise. This isn't just another DeFi platform trying to ride the wave. It’s a Layer 1 blockchain built from the ground up for high-speed crypto trading - and it’s already been hit by a $700,000 attack from North Korean hackers. That’s not a glitch. That’s a red flag.
What Is Hyperliquid?
Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that runs on its own blockchain, not Ethereum or Solana. It’s designed to be fast, cheap, and scalable - especially for derivatives and perpetual contracts. Unlike most DEXs that rely on slower, congested networks, Hyperliquid uses two custom protocols: HyperEVM for Ethereum compatibility and HyperBFT for lightning-fast consensus. This combo lets users trade Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other major coins with near-instant settlement and low fees. It sounds great on paper. But speed alone doesn’t make a good exchange. Security does.The $700,000 Hack That Shook the Crypto World
In December 2024, something went terribly wrong. North Korean state-sponsored hackers exploited a vulnerability in Hyperliquid’s bridge contract and pulled off a series of unauthorized trades. Over $700,000 in crypto vanished. The attack wasn’t random. It was precise, coordinated, and targeted - the kind of operation only well-funded, highly skilled threat actors pull off. This wasn’t the first time North Korean hackers hit a crypto platform. They’ve stolen over $2 billion since 2020, targeting exchanges with weak security. But Hyperliquid’s case was different. It wasn’t a centralized exchange with a single wallet breach. It was a decentralized platform built on a brand-new blockchain - and it still got owned. The fallout was immediate. The HYPE token, Hyperliquid’s native coin, dropped 18.7% in just 24 hours. Investors didn’t just panic - they ran. And they had every reason to.Why This Hack Matters More Than You Think
Most people think decentralization means safety. But Hyperliquid’s attack proved that’s not always true. In fact, it exposed a dangerous flaw: validator centralization. Even though Hyperliquid is a DEX, its network relies on a small group of validators to confirm transactions. If just a few nodes control the majority of the network, they become a single point of failure. That’s exactly what the hackers targeted. No need to break into wallets - just manipulate the chain itself. Compare that to Coinbase or Kraken. They use cold storage for 95%+ of user funds. Even if they get hacked, most assets stay safe. Hyperliquid? No public data on how much is stored offline. No clear reimbursement policy. And no track record of covering losses. That’s a huge risk. If you’re trading $10,000 worth of ETH on Hyperliquid, and the chain gets compromised again, you might lose it all - and get nothing back.
Security: What’s Been Done vs. What’s Needed
Hyperliquid did get its bridge contract audited by Zellic, a respected security firm. That’s good. But audits are snapshots - not ongoing protection. The hackers didn’t exploit a flaw Zellic missed. They exploited a weakness that only appears under real-world attack conditions. Here’s what Hyperliquid needs to fix - and fast:- Distributed Validator Technology (DVT): Instead of relying on 5-10 validators, spread control across dozens of nodes. If one node is compromised, the rest can still keep the chain secure.
- Real-time transaction monitoring: AI tools that flag unusual trading patterns - like sudden large sell-offs or repeated failed withdrawals - could catch attacks before they complete.
- Cross-chain security standards: If you’re connecting to Ethereum or Solana, your security can’t be weaker than those networks. Right now, it is.
- Public reserve fund: If you’ve been hacked before, you owe users protection. Set aside a portion of fees to reimburse losses. No excuses.
How to Stay Safe If You Use Hyperliquid
If you’re still considering trading here - or already are - here’s how to protect yourself:- Never store large amounts on the exchange. Use a hardware wallet like Ledger or Trezor. Keep your crypto offline.
- Enable 2FA on every account. Use an authenticator app (like Authy or Google Authenticator), not SMS. SMS can be intercepted.
- Bookmark the official site. Phishing sites look identical to Hyperliquid’s. Always type the URL yourself or use a saved bookmark.
- Watch for official updates. Follow Hyperliquid on Twitter and Discord. If they’re silent after a breach, that’s a bad sign.
- Check your wallet permissions. Revoke access to any dApp you no longer use. Hackers often steal funds through old, forgotten approvals.
How Hyperliquid Compares to Other Exchanges
| Feature | Hyperliquid | Coinbase | Kraken | Bybit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Decentralized (DEX) | Centralized (CEX) | Centralized (CEX) | Centralized (CEX) |
| Security Incidents | Yes ($700K in Dec 2024) | No major hacks | No major hacks | Yes (2023, $150M, reimbursed) |
| Reimbursement Policy | Not disclosed | Yes (insurance fund) | Yes (insurance fund) | Yes (after 2023 hack) |
| Cold Storage | Unknown | 98%+ of funds | 95%+ of funds | 95%+ of funds |
| 2FA Support | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Best For | High-speed derivatives, tech-savvy traders | Beginners, fiat on-ramps | Advanced traders, low fees | Perpetuals, leverage trading |
Is Hyperliquid Worth It?
If you’re a high-frequency trader who needs sub-second execution and hates gas fees - Hyperliquid might be tempting. Its tech is impressive. The speed is real. The fees are low. But if you care about safety? The answer is no - not yet. This isn’t a platform you trust with your life savings. It’s a gamble. And right now, the odds are stacked against you. Compare it to Kraken or Coinbase. They’ve been around for years. They’ve survived multiple hacks. They’ve paid out billions in reimbursements. They’ve built trust through transparency - not just code. Hyperliquid hasn’t earned that yet.What’s Next for Hyperliquid?
The team says they’re working on improvements. But there’s no public roadmap. No timeline. No clear plan for how they’ll fix validator centralization or build a reimbursement fund. Until they do - treat this like a beta test. Only trade with money you’re willing to lose. Keep your position small. And never, ever assume your funds are safe. The crypto world moves fast. But security doesn’t. And Hyperliquid’s biggest hurdle isn’t technology - it’s credibility.Final Verdict
Hyperliquid has the potential to be a game-changer - if it survives its own growing pains. But right now, it’s a high-risk experiment. The speed is exciting. The security is shaky. The token price is volatile. And the hackers are still watching. If you’re looking for a reliable place to trade crypto, look elsewhere. If you’re a risk-taker with a high tolerance for loss - and you’re ready to monitor every update - then maybe, just maybe, you can afford to try it. But don’t say you weren’t warned.Is Hyperliquid safe to use?
Hyperliquid is not currently considered safe for storing large amounts of crypto. After a $700,000 hack by North Korean hackers in December 2024, serious concerns were raised about its validator centralization and lack of a reimbursement policy. While the platform has fast trading and low fees, its security infrastructure has not yet proven resilient against sophisticated attacks.
What happened to the HYPE token after the hack?
After the December 2024 hack, the HYPE token dropped 18.7% in just 24 hours. This sharp decline reflected investor panic over the platform’s ability to protect assets. Token prices in DeFi are highly sensitive to security events - especially for newer platforms without a proven track record.
Does Hyperliquid reimburse users if they get hacked?
Hyperliquid has not publicly disclosed a reimbursement policy. Unlike exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, or Bybit - which maintain insurance funds to cover losses - Hyperliquid offers no guarantee that users will be compensated if funds are stolen. This lack of transparency is a major red flag for risk-averse traders.
How does Hyperliquid compare to Binance or Coinbase?
Binance and Coinbase are centralized exchanges with years of security experience, cold storage for over 95% of funds, and clear reimbursement policies after past hacks. Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange built on a new blockchain with no public history of covering losses. While Hyperliquid offers faster trades and lower fees, it lacks the security infrastructure and trust track record of established platforms.
Should I use Hyperliquid for long-term holding?
No. Hyperliquid is not designed for long-term holding. It’s a trading platform with high volatility and unproven security. For holding crypto, use a hardware wallet like Ledger or Trezor. Never keep significant funds on any exchange - especially one with a recent security breach and no reimbursement policy.
What are the best alternatives to Hyperliquid?
For decentralized trading, consider Uniswap (on Ethereum) or dYdX (on its own chain). For centralized trading with strong security, use Kraken, Coinbase, or Bitstamp. All three have proven track records, insurance funds, and 95%+ cold storage. Avoid newer DEXs without public security audits or reimbursement policies unless you’re prepared to lose your funds.
vinay kumar
Hyperliquid is just another crypto gamble with fancy jargon
Speed means nothing if your funds vanish in a heartbeat
Anyone using this is asking for trouble
Samantha bambi
I appreciate the detailed breakdown of the security flaws, but I think it's important to acknowledge that decentralization doesn't automatically equate to safety. This post does a great job highlighting the gap between technical innovation and real-world risk management.
sammy su
look i get the speed thing but if you lose your money and no one gives it back whats the point
ive used kraken for years and never lost a dime
Abhishek Anand
The fundamental fallacy here is the assumption that decentralization implies security. This is a philosophical error rooted in the crypto-utopian mythos. Hyperliquid's architecture doesn't transcend human fallibility-it merely redistributes it. The validator centralization flaw isn't a bug; it's the inevitable consequence of optimizing for performance over distributed trust. One must ask: Is efficiency worth the erosion of systemic resilience? The answer, as history shows, is always no.
Lara Ross
Thank you for this incredibly thorough and well-researched analysis. It's crucial that we hold emerging platforms accountable-not out of fear, but out of responsibility to the broader community. Your points about reimbursement policies and validator distribution are exactly what needs to be prioritized in DeFi's next phase.
Leisa Mason
Another crypto bro pretending innovation excuses incompetence
They hacked a DEX and you're surprised?
Everyone knew this was coming
Rob Sutherland
It's interesting how we equate speed with progress. But maybe true progress is building something that lasts-not something that just moves fast. I wonder if Hyperliquid will ever learn that security isn't a feature you add later. It's the foundation.
Tim Lynch
The $700K hack wasn't just a breach-it was a wake-up call echoing through every DeFi wallet out there. This isn't about code. It's about trust. And trust? It doesn't get rebuilt with audits. It gets rebuilt with transparency. And right now? Hyperliquid is whispering in a hurricane.
Melina Lane
I've been trading on Hyperliquid for a few months and honestly I'm scared but also excited. The speed is unreal. I just keep 10% of my portfolio there and the rest in cold storage. Maybe that's the way to play it-dabble but don't dive.
andrew casey
The absence of a publicly disclosed reimbursement policy constitutes a material omission that renders the platform fundamentally unsuitable for institutional or even retail participation. The risk-reward calculus is not merely skewed-it is mathematically indefensible.
Lani Manalansan
I think it's important to remember that innovation always comes with risk. Hyperliquid is pushing boundaries, and yes, they got hit. But maybe that’s how we learn. Instead of just calling it unsafe, let’s push them to fix it. Support the effort, don’t just cancel it.
Frank Verhelst
I keep my crypto on Hyperliquid and I'm not worried 😎
if they get hacked again I'll just move on
its crypto bro
Roshan Varghese
this was all planned by the fed to kill crypto
the hack was inside job
they want you to think it's unsafe so you go back to banks
they control the audits too
trust no one
Dexter Guarujá
America built the internet. China builds infrastructure. India builds apps. And now this? A bunch of devs in a garage thinking they can outsmart nation-state hackers? This isn't innovation-it's negligence with a whitepaper.
Jennifer Corley
You say validator centralization is the problem. But have you considered that maybe the real issue is that no one should be using a platform this new with zero track record? The hack wasn't the failure. The failure was choosing to trust it at all.
Natalie Reichstein
People still using this after the hack? Honestly. You're not a trader. You're a sucker. There's no excuse for not knowing better. If you lost money here, you deserved it.
Kaitlyn Boone
the token dropped 18 percent and everyone freaks out
lol
crypto is just gambling with graphs
James Edwin
I'm curious-has anyone tracked how many of the validators are tied to known entities? If the same group controls 70% of the nodes, that’s not decentralization. That’s a cartel with a blockchain label.
Kris Young
I think this post is spot-on. The speed is amazing, but without transparency and reimbursement, it's like buying a sports car with no brakes. You can go fast, but you're going to crash. And when you do, no one will help you.
Marilyn Manriquez
The structural vulnerability exposed by this incident underscores a systemic flaw in the current DeFi paradigm: the prioritization of technical novelty over institutional maturity. Until governance mechanisms are robust, auditable, and inclusive, no decentralized platform can claim legitimacy.
taliyah trice
i just use coinbase. its easy. i dont care about the speed. i care about my money being there when i need it
Charan Kumar
hyperliquid is good for small trades only
never keep big amount
indian traders know this already
we learned from binance crash
Peter Mendola
The absence of a formalized insurance mechanism renders this platform non-compliant with fiduciary standards. The $700K loss is not an anomaly-it is an inevitability.
Terry Watson
I’ve been watching this space for months. The team seems smart, but they’re moving too fast. I hope they pause, listen to the community, and fix the validator issue before another attack. We need more builders who care, not just coders chasing hype.
Sunita Garasiya
Oh so now decentralization is a myth? Funny, because the same people who screamed 'not your keys not your crypto' are now panicking because the keys were on a chain they didn't fully control. Welcome to the real world, folks. The blockchain doesn't care if you're emotionally invested.