Hyperliquid Crypto Exchange Review: Speed, Security, and the $700K Hack That Changed Everything

Hyperliquid Crypto Exchange Review: Speed, Security, and the $700K Hack That Changed Everything

Crypto Exchange Security Score Calculator

Assess Your Exchange Security Risk

This tool helps you calculate the security risk score of a crypto exchange based on key security features and incident history.

Risk Level: Low

When you hear "hype crypto exchange," you might think of flashy ads, celebrity endorsements, or promises of instant riches. But if you're actually considering trading on Hyperliquid, you need to cut through the noise. This isn't just another DeFi platform trying to ride the wave. It’s a Layer 1 blockchain built from the ground up for high-speed crypto trading - and it’s already been hit by a $700,000 attack from North Korean hackers. That’s not a glitch. That’s a red flag.

What Is Hyperliquid?

Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that runs on its own blockchain, not Ethereum or Solana. It’s designed to be fast, cheap, and scalable - especially for derivatives and perpetual contracts. Unlike most DEXs that rely on slower, congested networks, Hyperliquid uses two custom protocols: HyperEVM for Ethereum compatibility and HyperBFT for lightning-fast consensus. This combo lets users trade Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other major coins with near-instant settlement and low fees.

It sounds great on paper. But speed alone doesn’t make a good exchange. Security does.

The $700,000 Hack That Shook the Crypto World

In December 2024, something went terribly wrong. North Korean state-sponsored hackers exploited a vulnerability in Hyperliquid’s bridge contract and pulled off a series of unauthorized trades. Over $700,000 in crypto vanished. The attack wasn’t random. It was precise, coordinated, and targeted - the kind of operation only well-funded, highly skilled threat actors pull off.

This wasn’t the first time North Korean hackers hit a crypto platform. They’ve stolen over $2 billion since 2020, targeting exchanges with weak security. But Hyperliquid’s case was different. It wasn’t a centralized exchange with a single wallet breach. It was a decentralized platform built on a brand-new blockchain - and it still got owned.

The fallout was immediate. The HYPE token, Hyperliquid’s native coin, dropped 18.7% in just 24 hours. Investors didn’t just panic - they ran. And they had every reason to.

Why This Hack Matters More Than You Think

Most people think decentralization means safety. But Hyperliquid’s attack proved that’s not always true. In fact, it exposed a dangerous flaw: validator centralization.

Even though Hyperliquid is a DEX, its network relies on a small group of validators to confirm transactions. If just a few nodes control the majority of the network, they become a single point of failure. That’s exactly what the hackers targeted. No need to break into wallets - just manipulate the chain itself.

Compare that to Coinbase or Kraken. They use cold storage for 95%+ of user funds. Even if they get hacked, most assets stay safe. Hyperliquid? No public data on how much is stored offline. No clear reimbursement policy. And no track record of covering losses.

That’s a huge risk. If you’re trading $10,000 worth of ETH on Hyperliquid, and the chain gets compromised again, you might lose it all - and get nothing back.

Friendly security knights behind a wall vs. a wobbly tower of playing cards labeled Hyperliquid.

Security: What’s Been Done vs. What’s Needed

Hyperliquid did get its bridge contract audited by Zellic, a respected security firm. That’s good. But audits are snapshots - not ongoing protection. The hackers didn’t exploit a flaw Zellic missed. They exploited a weakness that only appears under real-world attack conditions.

Here’s what Hyperliquid needs to fix - and fast:

  • Distributed Validator Technology (DVT): Instead of relying on 5-10 validators, spread control across dozens of nodes. If one node is compromised, the rest can still keep the chain secure.
  • Real-time transaction monitoring: AI tools that flag unusual trading patterns - like sudden large sell-offs or repeated failed withdrawals - could catch attacks before they complete.
  • Cross-chain security standards: If you’re connecting to Ethereum or Solana, your security can’t be weaker than those networks. Right now, it is.
  • Public reserve fund: If you’ve been hacked before, you owe users protection. Set aside a portion of fees to reimburse losses. No excuses.

How to Stay Safe If You Use Hyperliquid

If you’re still considering trading here - or already are - here’s how to protect yourself:

  • Never store large amounts on the exchange. Use a hardware wallet like Ledger or Trezor. Keep your crypto offline.
  • Enable 2FA on every account. Use an authenticator app (like Authy or Google Authenticator), not SMS. SMS can be intercepted.
  • Bookmark the official site. Phishing sites look identical to Hyperliquid’s. Always type the URL yourself or use a saved bookmark.
  • Watch for official updates. Follow Hyperliquid on Twitter and Discord. If they’re silent after a breach, that’s a bad sign.
  • Check your wallet permissions. Revoke access to any dApp you no longer use. Hackers often steal funds through old, forgotten approvals.

How Hyperliquid Compares to Other Exchanges

Hyperliquid vs. Top Crypto Exchanges
Feature Hyperliquid Coinbase Kraken Bybit
Type Decentralized (DEX) Centralized (CEX) Centralized (CEX) Centralized (CEX)
Security Incidents Yes ($700K in Dec 2024) No major hacks No major hacks Yes (2023, $150M, reimbursed)
Reimbursement Policy Not disclosed Yes (insurance fund) Yes (insurance fund) Yes (after 2023 hack)
Cold Storage Unknown 98%+ of funds 95%+ of funds 95%+ of funds
2FA Support Yes Yes Yes Yes
Best For High-speed derivatives, tech-savvy traders Beginners, fiat on-ramps Advanced traders, low fees Perpetuals, leverage trading
A child holding a teddy bear wallet on a bridge, choosing safety over a risky crypto platform.

Is Hyperliquid Worth It?

If you’re a high-frequency trader who needs sub-second execution and hates gas fees - Hyperliquid might be tempting. Its tech is impressive. The speed is real. The fees are low.

But if you care about safety? The answer is no - not yet.

This isn’t a platform you trust with your life savings. It’s a gamble. And right now, the odds are stacked against you.

Compare it to Kraken or Coinbase. They’ve been around for years. They’ve survived multiple hacks. They’ve paid out billions in reimbursements. They’ve built trust through transparency - not just code.

Hyperliquid hasn’t earned that yet.

What’s Next for Hyperliquid?

The team says they’re working on improvements. But there’s no public roadmap. No timeline. No clear plan for how they’ll fix validator centralization or build a reimbursement fund.

Until they do - treat this like a beta test. Only trade with money you’re willing to lose. Keep your position small. And never, ever assume your funds are safe.

The crypto world moves fast. But security doesn’t. And Hyperliquid’s biggest hurdle isn’t technology - it’s credibility.

Final Verdict

Hyperliquid has the potential to be a game-changer - if it survives its own growing pains. But right now, it’s a high-risk experiment. The speed is exciting. The security is shaky. The token price is volatile. And the hackers are still watching.

If you’re looking for a reliable place to trade crypto, look elsewhere. If you’re a risk-taker with a high tolerance for loss - and you’re ready to monitor every update - then maybe, just maybe, you can afford to try it. But don’t say you weren’t warned.

Is Hyperliquid safe to use?

Hyperliquid is not currently considered safe for storing large amounts of crypto. After a $700,000 hack by North Korean hackers in December 2024, serious concerns were raised about its validator centralization and lack of a reimbursement policy. While the platform has fast trading and low fees, its security infrastructure has not yet proven resilient against sophisticated attacks.

What happened to the HYPE token after the hack?

After the December 2024 hack, the HYPE token dropped 18.7% in just 24 hours. This sharp decline reflected investor panic over the platform’s ability to protect assets. Token prices in DeFi are highly sensitive to security events - especially for newer platforms without a proven track record.

Does Hyperliquid reimburse users if they get hacked?

Hyperliquid has not publicly disclosed a reimbursement policy. Unlike exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, or Bybit - which maintain insurance funds to cover losses - Hyperliquid offers no guarantee that users will be compensated if funds are stolen. This lack of transparency is a major red flag for risk-averse traders.

How does Hyperliquid compare to Binance or Coinbase?

Binance and Coinbase are centralized exchanges with years of security experience, cold storage for over 95% of funds, and clear reimbursement policies after past hacks. Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange built on a new blockchain with no public history of covering losses. While Hyperliquid offers faster trades and lower fees, it lacks the security infrastructure and trust track record of established platforms.

Should I use Hyperliquid for long-term holding?

No. Hyperliquid is not designed for long-term holding. It’s a trading platform with high volatility and unproven security. For holding crypto, use a hardware wallet like Ledger or Trezor. Never keep significant funds on any exchange - especially one with a recent security breach and no reimbursement policy.

What are the best alternatives to Hyperliquid?

For decentralized trading, consider Uniswap (on Ethereum) or dYdX (on its own chain). For centralized trading with strong security, use Kraken, Coinbase, or Bitstamp. All three have proven track records, insurance funds, and 95%+ cold storage. Avoid newer DEXs without public security audits or reimbursement policies unless you’re prepared to lose your funds.

  1. vinay kumar

    Hyperliquid is just another crypto gamble with fancy jargon
    Speed means nothing if your funds vanish in a heartbeat
    Anyone using this is asking for trouble

  2. Samantha bambi

    I appreciate the detailed breakdown of the security flaws, but I think it's important to acknowledge that decentralization doesn't automatically equate to safety. This post does a great job highlighting the gap between technical innovation and real-world risk management.

Write a comment